MAHALUXMI RICE MILLS Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The area of dispute, in this appeal, has now been considerably narrowed down with the decision of a three Judge Bench of this Court in Food Corporation of India v. State of Kerala, (1997) 3 SCC 410,. The short question now remains is whether the market fee payable to the Market Committee constituted under the U. P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 (for short "the Act") shall be paid by the seller or purchaser when agricultural produce is sold by a trader to the Government. The aforesaid question arose under the following facts:

(2.) Appellants are traders carrying on business in rice milling within certain areas constituted in the State of U. P. Such areas have been notified as market areas under Section 6 of the Act. Among the business activities carried on by the appellants they purchased paddy from cultivators or sellers outside the market area and the paddy so purchased is hulled to make it rice for sale. They are under a duty to sell rice to the State Government as levy by virtue of Clause (3) of the U. P. Rice and Paddy (Levy and Regulation of Trade) Order, 1985, which was issued under the Essential Commodities Act, It will hereinafter be referred to as the "Levy Order".

(3.) Provisions of the Act envisage the formation of a Market Committee for each market area and the said Committee is empowered to levy and collect fee called "market fee" on transactions of sale of agricultural produce which take place within the market area, at such rates as the State Government may specify by notification. Section 17(iii) of the Act reads thus: