LAWS(SC)-1988-1-37

LAXMIKANT DHAL Vs. STATE OF ORISSA

Decided On January 12, 1988
Laxmikant Dhal Appellant
V/S
STATE OF ORISSA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Special leave granted.

(2.) The appellants are a group of people who had been selected for appointment to ministerial posts in the establishment of District Judge, balasore in the State of Orissa. The recruitment was vacated and challenge was raised before the State Administrative tribunal. Orissa. The tribunal came to the conclusion that it had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute but it dismissed the claim on merit. The short question on which this appeal has to be allowed is that the tribunal had nojurisdiction to entertain the dispule because a five Judge bench of this court in S. P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India has held that if such jurisdiction is conferred on the tribunal set up under the administrative tribunals Act, control conferred on the High court under Article 235 of the Constitution would be affected. By amendment Parliament has accepted that position. In such circumstances we must hold that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute. The finding on merit has, therefore, to be vacated as one without jurisdiction.

(3.) The appeal is allowed and the decision of the tribunal is set aside. It is open to the appellants to ask for relief before the appropriate authority, if so advised. Status quo will continue for 10 days. No costs. ,