AJAY @ NEETU Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

(2.) With the assistance of the counsel for the appellant, we have perused the evidence on record and the two judgments in question. In our opinion, the view taken by the trial court on the basis of the analysis of the evidence on record, in particular, the evidence of prosecutrix (PW-3), which commended to the High Court, warrants no interference. While analyzing the evidence of PW-3, the trial court noted thus:-

(3.) The High Court in appeal, after analyzing the same evidence, opined thus:-