SURINDER PAHALWAN Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard finally Mr. S.S. Khanduja, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State.

(2.) The main question agitated in the appeal is that the appellant was not served of notice of the appeal in the High Court while reversing the judgment of the acquittal passed by the trial court. Various order sheets have been reproduced by the appellant in the memo of appeal. Following averments have been made in the appeal.

(3.) Learned counsel for the State was unable to controvert the aforesaid position.