SICAGEN INDIA LTD. Vs. MAHINDRA VADINENI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) These appeals arise out of the judgment and orders dated 14.11.2011 in Crl.O.P. No.20401 of 2011 and 15.12.2014 in Crl.O.P.S.R.No. 55782 of 2014 passed by the HighCourt of Judicature at Madras in and by which the High Court has quashed the criminalcomplaints filed by the appellant - complainant under Sec. 138 of the NegotiableInstruments Act.

(3.) For convenience, the facts in C.C.No. 4029/2010 (Crl.O.P. No. 20401 of 2011) arereferred to. Case of the appellant-complainant is that they had business dealings with therespondents and in the course of business dealings, the respondents had issued threecheques viz.