REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SHAIK NAGOOR Appellant

V/S

STATE OF ANDHARA PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. KRISHNAMURTI LAXMIPATI NAIDU [REFERRED TO]
SURAJDEO OJHA V. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
NANHAU RAM V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
KAKE SINGH V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
RASHEED BEG VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MUNNU RAJA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
K RAMACHANDRA REDDY VS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [REFERRED TO]
RAM MANORATH CHHOTEY VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MOHANLAL GANGARAM GEHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAM SAGAR YADAV [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MADAN MOHAN [REFERRED TO]
PANIBEN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
BABU LAL VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RAVI VS. STATE OF T N [REFERRED TO]
MUTHU KUTTY VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. By the impugned judgment conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') was upheld, but the conviction for offence punishable under Section 306 IPC was set aside. However the sentence of three years imprisonment for offence punishable under Section 354 IPC which was imposed by the trial court was reduced to two years. The sentence of six months imprisonment and fine for offences relatable to Section 448 IPC were maintained by the High Court.

(3.) Prosecution version in a nutshell is as follows:

Click here to view full judgment.

SHAIK NAGOOR Vs. STATE OF A P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address