LILAWATI AGARWAL Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEAVE granted in SLP (C) Nos. 15653, 15657, 15683 and 20741 of 2004.

(2.) ALL these appeals involve identical questions and are therefore, taken up together for disposal. The basic issues involved in these appeals relate to entitlement of the claimants/ appellants for benefits under Sections 23 (1-A), 23 (2) and Section 28 of the Land acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the 'act' ).

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the respondent-State and bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (in short the 'bccl') the beneficiary for whose benefit the land was acquired submitted that the view in Paripuranan II is not correct as a three judge Bench had taken a view clearly contrary to what has been stated by the constitution Bench in Raghubir Singh's case (supra ).