(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The matter relates to a property acquired under the said Act. A reference was made by the Collector in terms of the provisions thereof. First Respondent intended to be impleaded as the party therein. The same was rejected.
(3.) Contesting parties herein claimed themselves to be the heirs and legal representatives of Rani Rashmoni. We need not state the facts of the matter in detail as the same has been noticed by a Bench of this Court in Shyamali Das v. Illa Chowdhry, (2006) 12 SCC 300.