REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

KALAM ALIAS ABDUL KALAM Appellant

V/S

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KANTA PRASHAD RIZAK RAM VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION:DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
VAIKUNTAM CHANDRAPPA VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
BUDHSEN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
JADUNATH SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
JADUNATH SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MATRU ALIAS GIRISH CHANDRA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHWAR SINGH VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
SANTOKH SINGH VS. IZHAR HUSSAIN [REFERRED TO]
HARBAJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. BOOTA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
V C SHUKLA VS. STATE DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
SURESH CHANDRA BAHRI GURBACHAN SINGH RAJ PAL SHARMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAM NATH MAHTO VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH GOVIND JAGESHA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. LEKH RAJ [REFERRED TO]
RAMANBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
MALKHANSINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MUNSHI SINGH GAUTAM VS. STATE OF M P [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. Challenge in the appeal before the High Court was to the judgment and order dated 10.4.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Class II, Jaipur. By the said judgment, the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation.

(3.) Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:

Click here to view full judgment.

KALAM ALIAS ABDUL KALAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address