LAWS(SC)-2008-4-141

MAHIPATLAL PATEL Vs. CHIEF ENGINEER

Decided On April 01, 2008
MAHIPATLAL PATEL Appellant
V/S
CHIEF ENGINEER Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) This appeal is directed against an order passed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dated 20th of May, 2005 on an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 'the Act') for appointment of an arbitrator and for referring the dispute between the parties to him for adjudication. By the impugned order, the Chief Justice of the High Court on consideration of Clause 50 of the agreement entered into by the parties which provides for arbitration and in view of Section 85 of the Act, held that no appointment could be made under Section 11 of the Act and further held that the appellant in terms of Clause 50 of the agreement had to approach the arbitration tribunal and, accordingly, the application for appointment of arbitrator was rejected. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has come up by way of a special leave petition which on grant of leave was heard in the presence of the learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) The core question involved in this appeal relates to the interpretation of Section 85 of the Act. In order to appreciate the question, it is appropriate to refer to Section 85 of the Act which runs as under :-