RAMESHWAR PRASAD Vs. RAMESHWAR PRASAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, indore Bench dismissing LPA No. 16 of 1993 filed by the appellant Rameshwar Prasad. In this appeal the legal representatives of rameshwar Prasad have been impleaded after his death. By the impugned judgment by which two LPAs. i. e. LPA Nos. 16 and 19 of 1993 were disposed of. LPA No. 16 of 1993 was filed by Rameshwar Prasad whereas other lpa was filed by the present respondent basanti Lal. Rameshwar Prasad had filed a suit for the relief of specific performance of contract. The trial court granted the relief of specific performance of the contract. First appeal No. 45 of 1976 was filed by Basanti lal, the respondent. The appeal was allowed and the judgment and decree of the trial court was set aside on the following terms :

(2.) BOTH Rameshwar Prasad and basanti Lal preferred appeals before the division Bench. By the impugned judgment so far as the appeal filed by Rameshwar Prasad is concerned the High Court held that the plaintiff had neither pleaded nor proved that he was ever ready and willing to pay interest, having failed to prove the purported waiver of interest, as claimed, the Division Bench held that the plaintiff has not established basic ingredients for decree of specific performance of contract. On that ground alone the appeal was dismissed and other points raised were not considered.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the respondent submitted that there was dispute as regards the claim of payment of Rs. 4,500/- and if there was delay interest was payable. Plaintiff raised an absolutely frivolous plea that payment was being made on behalf of the defendant.