REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Appellant

V/S

R.SASIKUMAR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

RAGHAVENDRA SINGH VS. SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT JAIL KANPUR [REFERRED TO]
RUMANA BEGUM VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SUNIL FULCHAND SHAH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
R KESHAVA VS. M B PRAKASH [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. PAUL MANICKAM [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. KETHIYAN PERUMAL [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. CHAYA GHOSHAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. ALAGAR [REFERRED TO]
ANAND HANUMANTHSA KATARE VS. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court allowing the Habeas Corpus Petition filed by the respondent questioning the order of detention i.e. Detention Order 519/BDFGIS/99 dated 9.7.1999 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Chennai.

(2.) Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:

(3.) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the approach of the High Court is clearly wrong. There was no question of any representation even before the order of detention was passed and there was no question of sending it to the Advisory Board.

Click here to view full judgment.

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Vs. R SASIKUMAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address