REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

DURGESH SHARMA Appellant

V/S

JAYSHREE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

U.P.ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. V. HIND LAMPS LTD. [REFERRED TO]
ABU BAKAR ABDUL RAHIMAN AND CO. V. RAMBUX [REFERRED TO]
TOPAN HARJI AND CO. V. SINGHAI DALCHADN AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUMAR V. TULA RAM NATHU RAM [REFERRED TO]
PRAGJI SOORJI AND CO. OF BOM V. KALU MAL SHORI MAL AND CO. OF AMRITSAR [REFERRED TO]
GUDAVIJAYALAKSHMI VS. GUDA RAMACHANDRA SEKHARA SASTRY [REFERRED TO]
RAJNATH VS. L VIDYA RAM [REFERRED TO]
MAMTA GUPTA VS. MUKUND KUMAR GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
P SADAYANDI NADAR VS. VENUGOPALA CHETTY [REFERRED TO]
JAGATGURU SHRI SHANKARACHARYA JYOTISH PEETHADHISWAR SHRI VS. RAMJI TRIPATHI [REFERRED TO]
LAKSHMI NAGDEV VS. JITENDRA KUMAR NAGDEV [REFERRED TO]
PRIYAVARI MEHTA VS. PRIYANATH MEHTA [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. SAKOW INDUSTRIES FARIDABAD PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
(RAJA YUVRAJ) DATT SINGH VS. TEJDATT SINGH [REFERRED TO]
FIRM KANHAIYALAL DAGA VS. ZUMERLAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) A short but interesting questionof law has been raised before this Court in the present appeal as to the power, authority and jurisdiction to transfer suits/appeals/other proceedings by a High Court from one Court subordinate to it to another Court subordinate to another High Court.

(3.) To appreciate the controversy, it is appropriate to set out facts of the case. The appellant herein Durgesh Sharma is the husband of the respondent Smt. JayshreeSharma. Marriageof the parties was solemnized at Malegaon, DistrictNasik in the State of Maharashtra on May 16, 1989. It is not in dispute that after the marriage, both the parties lived in Ujjain in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Click here to view full judgment.

DURGESH SHARMA Vs. JAYSHREE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address