STATE OF HARYANA Vs. ANURAG SRIVASTAVA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The dispute relates to the selection of Respondent 2 to the post of assistant Archivist by the Subordinate Service Selection Board, Haryana, pursuant to an advertisement dated 7/12/1980. Under the advertisement, one post of Assistant Archivist was in the general category, two posts were reserved for ex-servicemen and two were reserved for Scheduled Castes. Respondents 1 and 2 applied for the post of Assistant Archivist under the general category. Under the advertisement, the requisite qualifications are:

(2.) On the last date for receipt of applications, namely, 7/1/1981, respondent 2 did not possess a Master's degree in Modern Indian History. She did possess a Master's degree in History, but in Group 'a', i. e. , medieval India. The marks-sheet which was annexed by her showed that the four papers which she had appeared in were in the group "medieval India". The 2nd respondent herself has stated in her letter dated 3/7/1981, addressed to the Director, Haryana State Archives, Chandigarh, that she had passed ma Examination in History (1200 AD-1787 AD) from Kurukshetra university in 1978. One paper was for the period 1627 AD-1761 AD Apart from this, she had already appeared in MA Examination in Modern Indian history (1707 AD-1947 AD) for obtaining additional qualifications and the result was awaited.

(3.) She subsequently obtained an MA in History in Group 'b' "modem indian History" on 16/7/1981. The High court has rightly held that on 7/1/1981 the last date for submitting the application, the 2nd respondent did notpossess a Master's degree with Modem Indian History as her subject. She obtained this qualification on 16/7/1981 subsequent to her interview and selection.