STATE OF TRIPURA Vs. ROOP CHAND DAS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In Babua Ram v. State of U. P and Union of India v. Karnail Singh benches of two Judges have taken the view that the limitation of three months for seeking a reference under Section 28-A would begin to run from the earliest of the awards given by the Reference court. However a contra view was taken by a bench of three Judges in Union of India v. Pradeep Kumari. When the matter was referred to a Constitution bench, the bench of three Judges in Jose Antonio Cruz. DOS R. Rodriguese v. Land Acquisition Collector had the two questions referred to a five-Judge bench before them namely:

(2.) The three-Judge bench answered that so far as the first question of the reference is concerned there is no difference of opinion between the benches. On the second question, on the facts in that case it did not arise for the reason that even the second reference asked for was beyond a period of three months and that, therefore, in that case it was held that there is no need for awaiting a decision by a Constitution bench. In para 6 it was pointed out that if and when such a question arises in an appropriate case perhaps reference to a five-Judge bench may become necessary. In this case that question in fact has arisen and that, therefore, the matter requires consideration by a bench of five Judges

(3.) Leave granted. Printing dispensed with. Appeal can be disposed of on the basis of the material on record. The matter may be placed before Hon'ble the chief justice for constitution of five-Judge bench and for disposal at an early date since several matters constantly keep coming up. Interim stay in the meanwhile. Court Master