CHARAN LAL SAHU Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This application has been filed by an Advocate of this Court by way of a public interest litigation. It had been listed earlier and learned Attorney General had entered appearance on behalf of the Union of India.

(2.) We have heard the petitioner. It has been couched in unsavoury language and the petitioner seems to have made an intentional attempt to indulge in mudslinging against the advocates, this Court in particular as also other constitutional institutions. Many of the allegations in his writ petition are likely to lower the prestige of this Court as the apex judicial institution. At one place in the writ petition, he has alleged :-

(3.) The writ petition has been drafted in a careless manner. At several places the pleadings are meaningless. At several other places they are contradictory. The allegations are clumsy and several irrelevant facts have been put into the petition to inflate its size.