REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

R.A.H. Siguran Appellant

V/S

Shankare Gowda @ Shankara Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

H N RISHBUD VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. MUBARAK ALI [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR E G BARSAY VS. STATE OF BOMBAY:HARNAM SINGH RAM SINGH KOCHHAR [REFERRED TO]
DELHI ADMINISTRATION VS. RAM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
MUNNALAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. N VENUGOPAL [REFERRED TO]
SAILENDRANATH BOSE VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
M G SUMKUNTE VS. STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
MUNI LAL VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
KHANDU SONU DHOBI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
A C SHARMA VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
PARBHU VS. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
LUMBHARDAR ZUTSHI VS. KING [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) VS. T. NATHAMUNI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) The question for consideration is whether the High Court was justified in quashing the proceedings against Respondent No.1 on the ground that Investigating Officer who conducted the investigation was not authorized to do so under the provisions of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (the Act).

(3.) The case of the prosecution is that a raid was conducted on the night of 27th Aug., 2010 in a lodge and it was found that Respondent No.1 had procured minor girls and sent them for prostitution through his co-accused. He was indulging in prostitution with the aid of co-accused. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Act read with Sections 366A, 372 Penal Code read with Sec. 34 Penal Code on 20th Aug., 2011.

Click here to view full judgment.

R.A.H. SIGURAN Vs. SHANKARE GOWDA @ SHANKARA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address