(1.) LEAVE granted.
(2.) APPELLANT is a consumer of electrical energy. Respondent is a licensee. A meter for the purpose of recording consumption of electrical energy was installed at his premise. It was replaced by an electronic meter. The electronic meter was tested by the officials of the respondent and it was found that the same was running fast by about +1.79% which is said to be beyond the BIS standard, as the meter installed in the premises was of Class -I category. He filed a writ petition before the High Court inter alia contending;
(3.) MR. Sanjay Parikh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in support of the appeal, inter alia, would submit;