R D BHATIA Vs. RAJINDER KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant who is an advocate has preferred this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 against the order dated 28/3/1992 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar council of India in BCI/tr Case No. 100 of 1990 suspending the appellant on the roll of the Bar council of Maharashtra and Goa for a period of two years with a further direction to pay a sum of Rs. 1,500. 00 as costs to the complainant. Respondent 1 herein, in exercise of its powers under Section 35 (3 (c) read with Section 36 as well as Section 43 (B) of the Advocates Act, 1961. The said appellant has b also filed the special leave petition referred to above against the order dated 18/10/1992 dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant against the said order dated 28/3/1992.

(2.) This appeal was heard and disposed of by us on 21/3/1996 by passing the following order:

(3.) Before we proceed to give reasons in support of our order referred to above allowing the appeal, it would be appropriate to briefly narrate the facts: