REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

C.KASTURI Appellant

V/S

SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NILKANTH PRASAD RAI JAI KRISHNA DEBI SINGH TANSUKH RAI JAIN RAM SANEHI SINGH NAWALKISHORE LAL ROAD TRANSPORT CO DHANBAD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [RELIED ON]
ADARSH TRAVELS BUS SERVICE VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [RELIED ON]
A VISWANATHAN VS. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PONDTCHERRY [APPROVED]
RAM KRISHNA VERMA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [RELIED ON]
AFSAR JAHAN BEGUM VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [RELIED ON]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) JUDGMENT

(2.) LEAVE granted.

(3.) THE question, therefore, as posed earlier, is : whether Rule 282 (2) (ii) would be read into the notified scheme and given an interpretation extending the town service up to the distance of 8 Kms. from the limits of town. Rule 282(1) reads thus :

Click here to view full judgment.

C KASTURI Vs. SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address