RAM CHANDRA PRASHAD SHARMA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By a common judgment delivered on January 23, 1963 the High Court at Patna decided four appeals preferred by the State of Bihar and two criminal revision petitions, one on behalf of the complainant and another on behalf of an accused person. These appeals arose out of four prosecutions launched against certain persons running mills or factories which were supplied with energy by the Patna Electricity Supply Company (hereafter referred to as P. E. S. Co. for the sake of brevity). The offences with which they were charged were under Ss. 39 and 44 (c) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (9 of 1910) and R.138 read with R. 56 made under the Act. The trying magistrate acquitted all those persons who are appellants before us in respect of each of these offences, except Ram Chander Prasad, appellant in Crl. A. 48 of 1963. He was convicted of all the three offences and sentenced variously. In appeal he was acquitted of the offence under S. 39 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna while his conviction and sentences under the other two provisions were upheld. The State thereupon preferred an appeal against his acquittal under S. 417 Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court. The State 1ikewise preferred appeals against the acquittal of the accused persons in the other three cases. All the appeals were heard together and were substantially allowed. The complainant Ram Chander Prasad Sharma's petition was allowed and that of an accused persons dismissed. The accused persons have, therefore, preferred four appeals before us and though we will deal with them in this judgment we will take them separately one after the other.

(2.) According to the prosecution, on June 11, 1958 the Assistant Engineer (Mains) of the P. E. S. Co. by name Chatterjee visited the Ramji Mills situate at Dinapur. The mill is run with a 15 horse power motor which is supplied with electric energy by P. E. S. Co. It is provided with a three phase meter. Chatterjee found the mill working but noticed that the disc of the meter was not rotating with the result that the consumption of electrical energy was not being registered at all. Upon inspection of the meter Chatterjee noticed that a piece of wire had been inserted into the meter through the top stud hole on the right hand side of the meter cover. This had been done by unscrewing the nut and thus exposing the stud hole. Eventually a report was made to the police by Chatterjee at the instance of Ramaswami the then Chief Engineer and General Manager of P. E. S. Co. After investigation the appellant was placed for trial before the Judicial Magistrate. First Class, Dinapur. He framed charges against him in respect of all the three offences. The appellant pleaded not guilty and denied having inserted the wire inside the meter or to have tampered with it in any way. His main defence, however, was that the mill belonged to the joint family and its management was in the hands of his father Nathuni Thakur. He further said that he was practicing medicine and was running a homoeopathic dispensary in Dinapur. He did not deny that the meter had been tampered with but according to him this was done by Chatterjee himself because he was not given illegal gratification which he had demanded from Lohari Pandit, who was the munshi of the mill.

(3.) All the courts are concurrent in holding that the appellant was running the mills and that he was a consumer as defined in S. 2(c) of the Act. Moreover, his convictions under S. 44 (c) and under R. 138 read with R. 56 are not challenged before us. In the circumstances it is not open to him now to say that he had no concern with the mills. The only question then is whether the offence under S. 39 has been brought home to him. Section 39 of the Act reads thus :