LAWS(SC)-2026-2-69

ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs. ERA INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) LIMITED

Decided On February 26, 2026
ICICI BANK LIMITED Appellant
V/S
Era Infrastructure (India) Limited Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I. INTRODUCTION : The Judge is not to innovate at pleasure. He is not a knight errant roaming at will in pursuit of his own ideal of beauty or of goodness [ Eera v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 15 SCC 133 (Nariman, J. quoting Cardozo, Nature of Judicial Process, p. 141)].

(2.) The issue, at large, is, whether simultaneous proceedings for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [ IBC or Code, used interchangeably] against the principal debtor as well as its corporate guarantor, or vice-versa, are maintainable?

(3.) It would seem, as has been mentioned earlier, that the issue stands squarely covered by a decision of this Court in BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. v. SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. & Anr. (2025) 1 SCC 456. However, since elaborate arguments were advanced spanning over a couple of days, covering a wide array of arguments, we have considered the matter in some depth.