(1.) Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
(2.) The Appellant is aggrieved by the dismissal of the review application for enhancement of compensation. The Appellant had approached this Court earlier and this Court vide order dated 18 February, 2011 permitted the Appellant to move an application for review which reads as follows:
(3.) The High Court having found that Exhibit C -17 is a relevant document, for the only reason that Appellant has restricted his claim to Rs. 35/ - per sq. ft. and not as Rs. 46/ - per sq. ft. in terms of Exhibit C -17, declined even to grant the rate of Rs. 35/ - per sq. ft. Even according to the High Court it was a case for enhancement of compensation. In our view it is not a relevant reasoning to deny the enhancement based on the said document to the extent of at least Rs. 35/ - per sq. ft.