LAWS(SC)-1995-4-62

ADVAITA NAND Vs. JUDGE SMALL CAUSE COURT MEERUT

Decided On April 04, 1995
Advaita Nand Appellant
V/S
Judge Small Cause Court Meerut Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) This appeal by the tenant arises out of a suit for eviction filed by respondent No. 3 on the ground of default in payment of rent under the provisions of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The said suit was filed in the Court of Judge, Small Causes Court, Meerut on January 9, 1990. Summons were issued fixing March 20, 1990 as the date for filing the written statement and March 28. 1990 was the date fixed for final hearing of the case in the Court. It appears that the copy of the plaint was not annexed with the summons served on the appellant. The appellant, therefore, moved an application before the Court on March 28, 1990 praying for supply of copy of the plaint. The said copy was supplied to appellant only on March 28, 1990 and on that day the Court passed an order directing that the written statement be filed within one month and July 24, 1990 was fixed as the date for final hearing of the case. On May 2, 1990 the appellant deposited the entire amount of rent that was due and claimed protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Act. The Judge, Small Cause Court, however, held that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 20(4) of the Act because the date of first hearing was April 27, 1990 and the arrears of rent were deposited on May 2, 1990 i.e. after April 27, 1990. By his judgment dated October 14, 1993, the Judge, Small Cause Court, therefore, decreed the suit and passed an order for ejectment against the appellant. The revision petition filed by the appellant against the said decree was dismissed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Meerut by Judgment dated May 24, 1994 and the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court by judgment dated July 7, 1994. Hence this appeal.

(3.) The short question which falls for consideration is whether the appellant is entitled to avail the benefit of Section 20(4) of the Act. The said provision, as amended by U. P. Act 28 of 1976, provides as follows :