LAWS(SC)-1995-1-61

MAJOR PAKHAR SINGH ATWAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On January 24, 1995
PAKHAR SINGH ATWAL Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal by special leave, arises from the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in CWP No. 1727/84, dated 25-7-1984.

(2.) A total extent of 821 kanals (1 kanal equivalent to 500 sq. yds.) of land was acquired for the public purpose of expansion of municipal town, Phagwara under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 by publication of the Notification dated 1-8-1975. The Land Acquisition Collector by his award dated 27-1-1977 determined the compensation at Rs. 313/- per marla (one marla is equivalent to 25 sq. yds.) for 'C' class lands, at Rs. 250/- per marla for 'D' class lands. On reference, the Tribunal by its award dated 2-3-1984 enhanced the compensation at Rs. 800/- per marla for 'A' class lands, at Rs. 750/- per marla for 'B' class lands, at Rs. 625/- per marla 'C' class lands and Rs. 500/- per marla for 'D' class lands. In the Writ Petition filed by the claimants for further enhancement for 'C' and 'D' class lands the High Court upheld the award of the Tribunal. Thus this appeal, by special leave.

(3.) Shri V. C. Mahajan, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the claimant raised three-fold contention. First, he contended that in a subsequent award dated May 5, 1985 for the 'C' class and 'D' class lands the Tribunal has respectively awarded at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- and Rs. 800/- per marla. Both the lands were acquired under the same Notification and that, therefore, the appellant also is entitled to the same rate. Secondly, it contended that the award in that case had since been challenged by the respondent in the High Court, this matter may be remitted to the High Court for re-consideration on the basis of the subsequent award. Thirdly, he contended that even otherwise the sale transactions indicated in the award of the Land Acquisition Officer do show that the lands in the neighborhood have higher market value than the compensation granted by the Tribunal for the acquired lands and that, therefore, the appellant also is entitled to the higher compensation at the same rates and for the additional benefits awardable under the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 68 of 1984.