(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) It is not necessary to dilate all the details of the chequered history of the litigation. Suffice it to state that in OS No. 2 of 1975 the trial court passed a preliminary decree on 244-1982 thus:
(3.) In the application for passing the final decree, there was a controversy which resulted in LPA No. 2651 of 1991. By judgment and decree dated 24/8/1994, the division bench directed thus: