REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAM AND SHYAM COMPANY Appellant

V/S

STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

K N GURUSWAMY VS. STATE OF MYSORE [RELIED ON]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MOHAMMAD NOOH [RELIED ON]
NAND KISHORE SARAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [RELIED ON]
TRILOCHAN MISHRA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. HARINARAYAN JAISWAL [REFERRED TO]
RAMANA DAYARAM SHETTY VS. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA [RELIED ON]
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE VS. JAINSON HOSIERY INDUSTRIES [REFERRED TO]
KASTURI LAL LAKSHMI REDDY REPRE SENTED VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [RELIED ON]
FERTILIZER CORPORATION KAMGAR UNION REGD SINDRI VS. UNION OF INDIA [RELIED ON]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ASHOK KUMAR VS. SHIV CHARAN SHARMA:UNION OF INDIA [RELIED ON]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Judgment of the court was delivered by -

(2.) AS the matter brooked no delay, when the arguments were concluded, the Court pronounced the order which reads as under :

(3.) A learned Single Judge issued a notice to the respondents calling upon them to show cause why rule nisi may not be issued. <PG>273</PG> In response to the notice, respondent 4 appeared and contended that the petitioner had an alternative remedy and on this short ground, the learned Single Judge rejected the writ petition. A division bench of the High court in the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant concurred with the learned Single Judge and dismissed the appeal. Hence this. appeal by special leave.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAM AND SHYAM COMPANY Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address