(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The present appeal arises out of pure civil proceedings initiated at the hands of the present appellants in the year 2003. The appellants filed a suit for declaring a compromise decree entered into between the respondents (defendants) as null and void, and not binding on the appellants. Additionally, the appellants also sought partition of a certain share in the ancestral property, which was in the possession of the defendants. The trial court dismissed the suit of the appellants vide order dtd. 2/3/2007. Thereafter, the appellants filed the first appeal before the High Court, which has also been dismissed by the impugned order dtd. 23/9/2022.
(3.) Since the present matter concerns various suits, we would like to state the facts of the matter in short and the same are as follows: