(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The important question that arises before this Court in the present case is:
(3.) The Respondent No. 2/ Steel Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as the SAIL/Complainant) had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated: 17.04.2012 with Respondent No. 3/ Shiv Mahima Ispat Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Accused Company) for the supply of Steel. During the financial year 2012 -13, the accused company ordered 208.01 metric tonnes of HR (Hot Rolled) coils, which were dispatched from the complainant's Bokaro Steel Plant to Kanakpura Railway Siding, Jaipur District on 25/12/2012 and 26/12/2012 through multiple invoices.