M. SIDDIQ Vs. MAHANT SURESH DAS AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Observers have submitted a report dated 05.07.2015 which inter alia state as under:

(2.) In that view and keeping in view the joint prayer made at the Bar Learned Counsel for the parties we see no reason why a direction in terms of what was stated in our Order 07.03.2014 referred to above should not be issued. We accordingly permit the authorised officer/Commissioner Faizabad Division, Faizabad, U.P. to replace the old and worn out tarpaulin sheet, jute matting bamboo, polythene sheet and ropes over the makeshift structure by new ones of the same size and quality and exactly in the same manner as they were previously placed. We also permit the authorised officer to cover the polythene sheet with six inches of soil. Needful shall be done in the presence of the Observers.

(3.) Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Appellants in C.A. Nos. 4768-4771 of 2011 points out that although there was a direction issued by this Court on 09.05.2011 asking the Registry to provide to the parties CDs containing electronic copies of the digital record summoned from the High Court, the needful has not been done so far. He prays for a direction to the Registry to comply with the said order. We see no reason to decline that prayer. The Registry shall take steps to provide to the parties CDs containing electronic copies of the digital record summoned from the High Court.