IMPRESSION PRINTS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Appeal is against the Judgment dated 27th December, 1999 by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT), New Delhi.

(2.) Briefly stated the facts are as follows: The Appellants are manufacturers, amongst others, of items like bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases. In this Appeal, we are concerned with the question as to whether the Appellants are entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 65/87-CE, dated 1st March, 1987 in respect of bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases. These items fall under Tariff Item 6301 which consists of "made up textile articles". Under the Notification, these articles have a "Nil" rate of duty "if made without the aid of power". The Appellants had not taken out any license and were not paying duty. They were issued a show-cause notice as to why duty be not levied on these items and why penalty be not imposed. The Appellants claimed that under the abovementioned Notification these items bore a "Nil" rate of duty and that they were therefore not liable to pay duty. Their case was not accepted on the ground that in the process of manufacturing printed bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases they mixed colour with the help of colour mixing machine which was operated with the aid of power. The Appellants were therefore called upon to pay duty. Penalty was also imposed on them. The Appeal of the Appellants has been dismissed by the CEGAT by the impugned Judgment.

(3.) Mr. Bagaria points out that the expression "made up" has been statutorily defined in Note 5 of Section XI as under: