STATE OF ORISSA Vs. LOKNATH RAY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEAVE granted.

(2.) THE factual background can be adumbrated concisely as follows:

(3.) IN support of the appeal, learned counsel for the State of Orissa submitted that the High Court missed to consider several vital aspects. Firstly, there is no prescription of a "fourth peon" in the yardstick prescribed. The post of "Daftary " is a promotional post and it carries higher scale of pay. That being the position, the last entrant cannot claim the post of the "Daftary".