ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER Vs. ISSAC PETER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted in the SLPs

(2.) In this batch of appeals, some are preferred by the State and some by the licensees/contractors. The matters arise under the Kerala Abkari Act. All of them pertain to the excise year 1981-82. The question is whether there was a failure on the part of the State in supplying the arrack undertaken by it to supply and whether the licensees are entitled to any rebate/remission in the amounts payable by them under the contracts, on account of such failure, if any. The earliest decision is in OP No. 2325 of the 1981-1, (Issac Peter v. Assistant Excise Commissioner). It was a writ petition filed by the licensee. It was allowed by a division bench of the Kerala High court on 14/11/1983 against which the State of Kerala and its officers have filed CA No. 3442 (NT) of 1984. Several other matters were allowed following the said decision against which the State has filed appeals. Another division bench of the High court, however, took a contrary view in AS No. 293 of 1983 andbatch disposed of on 26/10/1980. By this judgment, the suits filed by licensees/contractors were dismissed. Following the said judgment, several other appeals were disposed of in favour of the State. The licensees have filed appeals against those judgments.

(3.) The Kerala Abkari Act, 1077 corresponding to 1902 AD) was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to Import, Export, Transport, Manufacture, Sale and possession of intoxicating liquors and of intoxicating drugs in the State. Section 15 says that no liquor or intoxicating drug shall be sold without a licence from the Commissioner. Section 18-A provides for grant of exclusive or other privilege of manufacture and sale of liquor. Ss. (1 says :