(1.) In this case having regard to the stand taken by the appellant in his written statement, we think it is not an unconditional deposit under Section 20 (4 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (Act XIII of 1972. In fact, after narrating that the landlord did not have title in paragraph 15 it is averred:
(2.) The fact that even here no unmistakable term denies the title of the landlord would amount to a conditional deposit. The court below is correct. The civil appeal stands dismissed. The question of grant of time is left to the executing court. No costs.