REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

M.ISMAIL FARUQUI Appellant

V/S

UNION OF INDIA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

INDIRA NEHRU GANDHI V. RAI NARAIN [CITED]
CHARANJIT LAL CHOWDHARY VS. UNION OF INDIA [RELIED ON]
STATE OFBIHAR VS. KAMESHWAR SINGH:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH:GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:KAMESHWAR SINGH [RELIED ON]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. SUBODH GOPAL BOSE [RELIED ON]
COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOW MENTS MADRAS VS. LAKSHMINDRA THIRTHA SWAMIAR OF SHIRUR MUTT [RELIED ON]
UNDER ARTICLE 143 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; IN THE MATTER VS. PRESIDENT OF INDIA [RELIED ON]
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND COLLEC TOR KAMRUP VS. DURGANATH SARMA [RELIED ON]
KHAJAMIAN WAKF ESTATES VS. STATE OF MADRAS [RELIED ON]
HIS HOLINESS KESAVANANDA BHARATI SRIPADAGALVARU SHRI RAGHUNATH RAO GANPAT RAO N H NAWAB MOHAMMAD IFTIKHAR ALI KHAN SHETHIA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIMITED THE ORIENTAL GOAL GO LIMITED VS. STATE OF KERALA:UNION OF INDIA [CITED]
ACHARYA MAHARAJSHRI NARENDRA PRASADJI ANANDPRASADJI MAHARAJ VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [APPROVED]
MAHARAJ SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [APPROVED]
PRESIDENT OF INDIA VS. SPECIAL COURTS BILL 1978 [RELIED ON]
S P MITTAL SHRI RAGHUBIR AUROBINDO SOCIETY AUROBINDO SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [CITED]
S R BOMMAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [RELIED ON]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) "We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another. " Jonathan Swift Swami Vivekananda said:

(2.) The constitutional validity of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 (No. 33 of 3993 (hereinafter referred to as 'act No. 33 of 1993' or 'the Act') and the maintainability of Special Reference no. 1 of 1993 (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Reference") made by the President of India under Article 143 (1 of the Constitution of India are the questions for decision herein. The background in which these questions are to be answered is contained in the facts stated in the White Paper on Ayodhya, February 1993, issued by the government of India.

(3.) Certain undisputed facts emerging at the hearing may also have relevance for this purpose. These questions are answered on this basis, eschewing facts which are in the area of controversy and have yet to be adjudicated.

Click here to view full judgment.

M ISMAIL FARUQUI MOHD ASLAM HARGYAN SINGH THAKUR VIJAY RAGHO BHAGWAN BIRAJMANMANDIR JAMIAT ULAMA E HIND Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address