LAWS(SC)-1974-3-16

KESAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On March 04, 1974
KESAR SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an appeal by special leave filed by Kesar Singh, aged 23 years, who was convicted under Section 302 Indian Penal Code on three counts and sentenced to life imprisonment by an Additional Sessions Judge of Patiala for having committed the murders of three persons, namely, Gurbachan Singh, Karnail Singh and Dewan Singh, one after another, during the night between 20th and 21st June, 1970, in village Dhablan. On appeal against the conviction and a revision application by the State against the lesser penalty for murder, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal of Kesar Singh, but it allowed the revisions application of the State of Punjab enhancing the sentence of Kesar Singh to one of death.

(2.) The grounds given by the High Court for enhancing the sentence were:the motive was to avenge the murder of the appellant's brother-in-law Gurnam Singh committed about 7 or 8 years prior to the occurrence so that there could be no immediate provocation; the three murders were committed "in a very cold blooded and brutal manner when the deceased were sleeping on their cots", two shots from a 12 bore gun had been fired at each of three murdered men "indicating the determination to give no chance of survival to any one", "the time selected for the mirder was such that no possible help could be rendered to prevent the death of any of the three deceased and no obstruction could be possible to carry out the design of committing these murders". Before giving these reasons, quoted mostly in the words of the High Court itself, the High Court had relied on observations of this Court in Apren Joseph v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1:

(3.) Learned Counsel for the appellant has taken us through the evidence of the two eye-witnesses Gurdev Singh, P. W .3, and Nachhattar Singh, P. W. 4 whose testimony had been accepted wholly by the trial Court and the High Court about the murder of three men by the appellant singly, although the trail Court had disbelieved the very reason given for Gudeve Singh to wake up in time to see the murder of Gurbachan Singh, and, therefore, had acquitted the co-accused Kishori.