SIDDHI VINAYAKA COCONUT AND CO CHODISETTY CHANDRA RAO AND COMPANY Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH :STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The question for decision in these cases is about the liability to sales tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act of "watery coconuts". The Act contains four schedules. The First Schedule contains goods in respect of which a single point sales tax only in leviable under Section 5 (2) (a). The Second Schedule contains goods in respect of which a single point purchase tax only is leviable under Section 5 (2) (b). The Third Schedule contains declared goods in respect of which a single point tax only is leviable under Section 6. The Fourth Schedule contains goods exempted from tax under Section 8. By an amendment made in 1961, there was till 1963 only one entry; 'coconuts', in The Third Schedule and the Fourth Schedule contained 'tender coconuts which are useful only for drinking purposes' which were exempted from tax. An explanation to the Third Schedule read as follows :

(2.) After the amendment of 1963 certain dealers questioned their 'liability to tax on the purchases made by them of watery coconuts. That challenge was upheld by a learned single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Sri Krishna Coconut Co. v. Comml. Tax Officer, 16 STC 511 : (AIR 1966 Andh Pra 128). The learned Judge's reasoning was that a fully grown coconut with a well developed kernel which contains water could not be called either a tender or a dried coconut, and that this was the well-known variety of coconuts used for culinary purposes and on auspicious occasions and as part of the offerings in temples. He drew particular support for his conclusion from the omission of the word "fresh" from the new explanation in the Third Schedule.

(3.) Thereafter, by Amending Act 18 of 1966 the explanation in the Third Schedule was replaced by another explanation which read :