AMARJIT KAUR SMT TEJ KAUR BANTA SINGH KARAM CHAND RANJIT SINGH CHHANGA SINGH BAKSHISH SINGH HARBHAJAN SINGH Vs. PRITAM SINGH:AJAIB SINGH:BACHAN SINGH:PARTAP SINGH:NARINJAN SINGH:MAGHAR SINGH:HARBANS SINGH:MOHAN SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In these appeals, a common question of law arises for consideration and this judgment will dispose of all the appeals.

(2.) We will take up for consideration Civil Appeal No. 941 (N) of 1973. The appellant challenges the correctness of a decree passed by the High Court dismissing a suit for pre-emption. The plaint property belonged to defendant No. 4. He sold the same to defendants Nos. 1 to 3 by a sale deed dated July 29, 1965 and registered on October 14, 1965. The appellant who is the daughter of defendant No.4, claiming that she has a right to pre-empt, instituted the suit through her guardian. The trial court decreed the suit. Against the decree, an appeal, was preferred by the vendees. That appeal was dismissed on July 17, 1971. An appeal was preferred to the High Court against this decree. The Punjab Pre-emption (Repeal) Act, 1973 (Act 11 of 1973) received the assent of the Governor of Punjab on April 6, 1973 and was published in the Punjab Gazette on April 9, 1973. The High Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit holding that the provision of S.3 of the above Act should govern the decision. The plaintiff-appellant then applied for leave to file letters patent appeal. That was dismissed.

(3.) Section 3 of the Punjab Pre-emption (Repeal) Act, 1973 provides: