(1.) Leave granted in the above matters.
(2.) The concerns which have arisen during the course of hearing the present appeals are of particular significance for meeting the ends of criminal justice, and relate to the nature of chargesheets filed in some jurisdictions by the state/police. For the sake of convenience, we would divide the judgment into two parts. The first part relates to the legal issue, that is, the contents of the chargesheet in terms of Sec. 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ["Code", for short]. The second part deals with the factual aspects of each of the cases, and our decision.
(3.) The issue in the first part relates to chargesheets being filed without stating sufficient details of the facts constituting the offense or putting the relevant evidence on record. In some states, the chargesheets merely carry a reproduction of the details mentioned by the complainant in the First Information Report ["FIR", for short], and then proceed to state whether an offence is made out, or not made out, without any elucidation on the evidence and material relied upon. On this issue, the recent judgment of this Court in Dablu Kujur v. State of Jharkhand, 2024 SCC Online SC 269 aptly crystallises the legal position in the following words: