(1.) The substantial question arising for decision in this civil appeal is whether upon admission of an instrument in evidence and its marking as an exhibit by a court (despite the instrument being chargeable to duty but is insufficiently stamped), such a process can be recalled by the court in exercise of inherent powers saved by sec. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure [CPC, hereafter] for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court.
(2.) Assail in this civil appeal is to the judgment and order dtd. 26/9/2011 [impugned order, hereafter] passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru [High Court, hereafter] whereby His Lordship set aside the order dtd. 19/10/2010 passed by the Court of Additional Senior Judge-III, Mangalore [Trial Court, hereafter] and allowed the petition [Writ Petition No. 11653 of 2011 (GM-CPC)] preferred by the respondent under Article 227 of the Constitution.
(3.) The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, are adverted to in brief hereunder: