(1.) HEARD Mr. R. Balasubramanium, learned counsel for the appellants. None for the respondents. Ordinarily, we would have adjourned the matter, but regard being had to the fact that the controversy is covered by the decision in Union of India and Others Vs. Vartak Labour Union (2)1 , we have thought it appropriate to finally decide this appeal.
(2.) THE respondents preferred a Civil Writ Petition No. 12813 of 2004 in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh with the following prayers: -
(3.) (90) 9 - GE - II dated 2.2.2001 and further taking note of the earlier decision of the said Court in the CWP No. 8991 of 2001 (Avtar Chand and others Vs. Union of India ) decided on 23.01.2002, directed as follows: