RAM CHANDRA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have heard Ms. Sandhya Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ratnakar Dash, learned senior counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh.

(2.) The High Court in the impugned judgment has noted the twelve circumstances, which in its opinion form a complete chain which in all probability establish the complicity of the appellant in the offence. The circumstances noted by the High Court are :-

(3.) The High Court opined that the above circumstances provide for sufficient evidence for establishing the complicity of the appellant, Ram Chandra, in commission of crime under Sec. 302 and Sec. 364A of Indian Penal Code.