REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BHULE RAM Appellant

V/S

UNION OF INDIA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

THAKUR KAMTA PRASAD SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
ADUSUMILLI GOPALAKRISHNA VS. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION [REFERRED TO]
SHER SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
JAWAJEE NAGNATHAM VS. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ADILABAD A P [REFERRED TO]
LAND ACQUISITION OFFIER SUB COLLECTOR GADWAL VS. SREELATHABHOOPAL [REFERRED TO]
SUNDER VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VILUBEN JHALEJAR CONTRACTOR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
CHARAN DASS VS. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [REFERRED TO]
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER VS. KARIGOWDA [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD VS. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
BILKIS VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
TRISHALA JAIN VS. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL [REFERRED TO]
SABHIA MOHAMMED YUSUF ABDUL HAMID MULLA D BY L RS VS. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
HARI CHAND VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VYRICHERLA NARAYANA GAJAPATIRAJU VS. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIZAGAPATAM [REFERRED TO]
ASHRAFI VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED VS. G. MOHAN REDDY [REFERRED TO]
RAMANLAL DEOCHAND SHAH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 8.12.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Land Acquisition Appeal No. 154 of 2007 by which the High Court has assessed the market value of the land @Rs.6,51,000/- per acre modifying the award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') under which the land had been assessed @Rs.5,99,850/- per acre. The appellant claimed that his land ought to have been assessed @Rs.10,00,000/- per acre.

(2.) Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:

(3.) Ms. Shobha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Priya Hingorani, learned counsel appearing in other connected appeals have raised serious issues that the land ought to have been assessed at the rate on which the land covered by the same notification under Section 4 of the Act in the neighouring village have been assessed. Therefore, the appeal deserves to be allowed.

Click here to view full judgment.

BHULE RAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address