LAWS(SC)-2004-10-17

ANJLUS DUNGDUNG Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On October 04, 2004
ANJLUS DUNGDUNG Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant-Anjlus Dungdung along with his brother Jowakim Dungdung, accused Silbestor Dungdung and Rajesh Yadav alias Raju Gowala was charge-sheeted by the police. Before the commencement of trial as Jowakim Dungdung died, the other three accused persons, including the appellant, were tried and by judgment rendered by the trial Court, all of them were convicted under Section 302/120-B of the Penal Code. So far the appellant is concerned, he was awarded death penalty whereas other two accused persons were sentenced to imprisonment for life. All the three accused persons were further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 2,500/- each, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. On appeal being preferred before the High Court of Jharkhand, their conviction and sentence have been upheld.

(2.) The short facts are that on the basis of Fardbayan of one Kajmir Kerketta- informant (PW 19) recorded on 24th November, 1998 at 5.30 p.m., a First Information Report was drawn up at Simdega police station on the same day at 10.30 p.m. against unknown persons in which it was stated that the informant was next door neighbour of Benedik Dungdung and on 23rd November, 1998 at about 7.00 p.m., he had seen Benedik Dungdung and his family members in their house. On 24th November, 1998, as nobody came out from the house of Benedik Dungdung till 7.30 in the morning, the informant went to the courtyard and found that Benedik Dungdung along with his wife and four children was lying dead in the house, whereafter he informed about the same to the other villagers. It was further stated that a land dispute was going on between Benedik Dungdung (one of the deceased) and the appellant, who was nobody else than his nephew, for which panchayati was also held in the village sometime before the date of the alleged occurrence which was never attended by the appellant and his brother rather they had given out threats to kill the deceased. In the month of September, 1998, a letter was received by Jowakim Dungdung stating therein that the appellant had died. It was also stated that there was rumour in the village that the appellant with the help of accused Jowakim Dungdung and others murdered Benedik Dungdung, his wife and four children.

(3.) The police after registering the case took up investigation, during the course of which, it is said to have recovered the aforesaid letter as well as blood-stained balwa and tangi on the disclosure statement made by accused Rajesh Yadav alias Raju Gowala apart from the recovery of one torch cell, knife and a railway ticket from the pocket of the appellant. Upon the conclusion of investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet against the aforesaid accused persons, including the appellant, but as accused Jowakim Dungdung died, only three accused persons were tried.