LAWS(SC)-2004-4-25

STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. BHUPINDER SINGH

Decided On April 02, 2004
STATE OF PUNJAB Appellant
V/S
BHUPINDER SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The short question which arises for determination in this civil appeal is - whether the revised pay-scales of skilled and semi-skilled staff working in the Printing and Stationery department were applicable w.e.f. 1-1-1986 (when IIIrd Punjab Pay Commission gave its report) or w.e.f. 14-2-1989 when the State Government issued its notification implementing the recommendations of the Pay Commission.

(2.) The facts lie within narrow compass. Respondents herein joined the service as Assistants before 1978. Subsequently, they were promoted as Supervisors. On 1-1-1986, report was submitted by the IIIrd Punjab Pay Commission which was accepted by the Government enacting Punjab Civil Service (Revised Pay) Rules under which the pay of supervisor was fixed in the grade of Rs. 1500-2540. Respondents made a representation pointing that a serious anomaly had arisen on account of failure to prescribe a proper pay scale for the said post. The said matter was referred to Anomaly Committee. Realising its mistake, the Government fixed the pay scale of the supervisor in the grade of Rs. 2000-3500 w.e.f. 28-3-1989. Aggrieved, respondents herein filed Civil Writ Petition No. 1383 of 1990 in the High Court claiming pay fixation w.e.f. 1-1-1986. By judgment and order dated 21-4-1998, the learned single Judge allowed the Writ Petition in view of the earlier judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court in the case of Bhagirath Ram v. State of Punjab, dated 26-7-1994 in Civil Writ Petition No. 6778 of 1993, directing payment w.e.f. 1-1-1986. The appellant herein carried the matter in appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court. Following the above judgment in the case of Bhagirath Ram (supra), the Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal, however, directed the appellant herein to pay arrears of salary for 3 years and 2 months prior to the date of filing of writ petition. Hence, this civil appeal.

(3.) Shri H. S. Munjral, learned advocate for the appellant submitted that keeping in mind the recommendations of the IIIrd Punjab Pay Commission, the Department of Administrative Reforms vide letter dated 26-10-1988 recommended restructuring of the departments and granting of higher revised scales of pay and consequently the scales of pay of skilled and semi-skilled staff of the Department of Transport were enhanced prospectively w.e.f. 3-11-1989. Similarly the scales of pay of skilled and semi-skilled staff of Printing and Stationery Department were enhanced prospectively. It was urged that fixation of the date for grant of revised pay scales is within the discretion of the Government. It was urged that revised pay was payable w.e.f. 1-1-1986, notionally as held by the Division Bench of the High Court in the case of Ram Murti and others v. State of Punjab, dated 13-2-1996.