REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant

V/S

BALBIR SINGH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

ASHBY V. WHITE [REFERRED TO]
GEDDIS V. PROPRIETORS OF BANN RESERVOIR [REFERRED TO]
RONCARELLI V. DUPLESSIS [REFERRED TO]
SMITH V. EAST ELLOSE RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL [REFERRED TO]
CASSELL AND CO. LTD. V. BROOME [REFERRED TO]
ROOKES V. BARNARD [REFERRED TO]
KASTURI LAL RALIA RAM JAIN V. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
SHAM LAL NARULA VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PUNJAB JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIMACHAL PRADESH AND PATIALA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. MEMON MAHOMED HAJI HASAM DEAD [REFERRED TO]
LALA BISHAMBAR NATH VS. AGRA NAGAR MAHAPALIKA AGRA [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM SUNDER VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA VS. G C ROY:RAGHUNATH MOHAPATRA [REFERRED TO]
JASBIR KAUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. M K GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANCHAR VIHAR SAHKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD VS. SANCHAR VIHAR SAHKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD VS. PRIO RANJAN ROY [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
Y RAMAMOHAN VS. GAVERNMENT OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KAUSHNUMA BEGUM VS. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA VS. RAVINDRA [REFERRED TO]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LIMITED VS. PATRICIA JEAN MAHAJAN [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX PUNJAB JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND VS. SHAM LAL NARULA PATIALA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this batch of matters the question is whether grant of interest at the rate of 18% per annum by the Consumer Forums in all cases is justifiable. As facts are varying, at this stage, this Court is only dealing with the question of law. Thereafter this Court shall take up each case separately.

(2.) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission considered a bunch of matters, the lead matter being the case of Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Darsh Kumar. The Commission held, in those cases, that in cases, of decision of service by development authorities like HUDA and GDA, interest must be awarded at the rate of 18% per annum and that this would take into consideration the escalation in the cost of construction as well.

(3.) Pursuant to this judgment the National Commission has been disposing of all subsequent matters with a one paragraph order which, for all practical purposes, reads as under :-

Click here to view full judgment.

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. BALBIR SINGH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address