LAWS(SC)-2004-4-171

RAMESH MEHTA Vs. SANWAL CHAND SINGHVI

Decided On April 20, 2004
RAMESH MEHTA Appellant
V/S
SANWAL CHAND SINGHVI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE question raised in these civil appeals is - whether in counting "the whole number of members of the municipal board" in terms of rule 3(9) of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Motion of Non-Confidence against Chairman/Vice-Chairman) Rules 1974, nominated members have to be taken into consideration?

(2.) FOR sake of convenience, we refer to the facts in Civil Appeal No. 6133 of 2002.

(3.) WE have stated above that there is no justification for the non-consentees to claim parity with consentees. The third category pointed out by the Administration and some of which are also before us represented through their counsel are allottees of one kanal of plots. They are being offered same size of alternative plots and from them no consent was asked for. This category of allottees of one kanal of plot are also required to be accommodated in the available alternative plots.