H P HOUSING BOARD Vs. VARINDER KUMAR GARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These Appeals are directed against the Order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 21st April, 2003.

(2.) Briefly stated the facts are as follows :

(3.) It must be mentioned that pursuant to the complaint of the 1st Respondent the Appellants had appointed an Architect to visit the place and file a report. The Architect had found that the slab in the drawing room had lifted 6 cms from the centre towards the outer wall. The Architect had also found that the slab in the bedroom had lifted by 4.5 cms towards the outer window wall. The Architect had also found that very poor quality concrete had been used and that the mix could be taken out of the floor with bare fingers. In spite of such glaring defects having been found they had not been rectified by the Appellants.