EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Vs. SURESH CHANDRA SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) The respondent workman claims to have been appointed as a daily- wager with the Irrigation Department. A reference was made on the basis of alleged termination of the workman's services u/s. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the Labour Court. A written statement was filed on behalf of the officer named as the respondent (who is the first appellant before us). A defence was raised as to the merits of the claim and also with regard to the Labour Court's jurisdiction on the ground that the Irrigation Department was not an industry within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act. While the matter was pending before the Labour Court the reference was amended by adding another respondent to the reference. The added respondent is the second appellant in this appeal. Ultimately, an ex parte award was passed on 8.7.1997 in favour of the workman. On an application filed by the present appellants the ex- parte award was recalled on 9.10.1998. The Labour Court was of the view that the appellants should not be penalised because of the negligence of their representatives who were deputed to look after the case. The matter was directed to be expedited and the appellants were directed to pay costs of Rs 500 to the workman.

(3.) The workman filed a writ petition challenging the order recalling the ex parte award and the High Court came to the conclusion that the Labour Court had the jurisdiction to recall the ex parte award. The High Court also expressed the view that: