G. PANKAJAKSHI AMMA Vs. MATHAI MATHEW

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These appeals are against the Judgement of the High Court of Kerala dated 5-1-1998.

(2.) Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

(3.) The appellants claimed that there were chit-fund transactions between them and the respondents. The appellants claimed that in respect of the chit-fund transactions, a large number of blank documents were got signed from them. Their defence was that apart from monies received under the chit-fund transactions no other amounts were received by the appellants. The appellants admitted that in the chit-fund transactions a sum of approximately Rs. 25,000 remained to be paid. The appellants claimed that as the amount was not repaid, the 1st respondent had misused the blank documents and filed suits on the basis of promissory notes.